It is interesting to note that when
ever an apparently "new" ailment is being observed, as female
concerns often are, that it is assumed that they must have a
completely new cause that never existed before.
Traditional Herbal Philosophy
disputes this. Because, the Human body has remained virtually
unchanged containing exactly the same organs, in the same positions,
having the same functions for thousands of years. The only things
that have changed are the environment we currently live in, the
foods we now eat and our lifestyles. The environment is clearly less
rural and more urban, the foods are obviously less natural and more
processed or otherwise "treated" and our lifestyles are generally
more destructive and less loving.
The now cliché term "hormone
imbalance" focuses in on the hormones themselves. This new "catch
all" term is blamed for nearly everything to do with female problems. This
is like saying that "water is too wet" because it penalizes women for being
female and gives no explanation for their physical problems. Hormones exist and must exist within the body for it to
function but, the key questions are: how does the body make them, how does it
control them and how does the body itself balance them? Clearly this of greater
importance than to simply state - "Well, it's hormonal!"
To get lost in the discussion of
"balancing hormones" with other foreign hormones is like trying to hit a flying
bullet with another bullet. Finally, this concept is being popularly disputed.
Since nothing exists on its own - so it is also with hormones. One major hormone
like estrogen has to have
several other hormones acting with it to create harmony. The body on a physical
and sometimes emotional level can do
this in the proper proportion on its own. Should hormones
find themselves in disproportion, then it is entirely conceivable
that the organs that would produce them or otherwise keep them in
balance are not doing their job for one reason or another. It is the organ(s), not the hormones that are in imbalance.
The hormonal problem is just the consequence.
The
oversimplification of estrogen vs. progesterone is not logical
because there are literally thousands of hormones in the body all of
which commingle, increase or decrease and otherwise react to and
with each other and the body's circumstances.
Stress is a major factor for the
body as a whole. It will affect hormone levels. Stress affects all organs but,
stresses will affect some organs more than others. Which is to be expected.
If the organs are balanced through
proper diet and supplementation they create the harmony needed - the
hormones balance. This is a much simpler and safer approach because no foreign
or known potentially hazardous substance is being introduced into the body. It
is also easier than trying to balance one hormone with another hormone which
usually results in a non sustainable and fragile balance of hormones and the
familiar complications that result from it. Furthermore, as previously stated,
when the body produces say, estrogen, it also produces its satellite hormones in
proper proportion. If an external estrogen is introduced, it will not have the
accompanying hormones with it. Thus, creating another type of imbalance
with its resulting consequences.
If instead the glands and organs that
would create the hormones necessary for the body to function and the
organs that would eliminate the excess hormones the body no longer needs
were to be brought back into function the result would be a more
harmonious body function inclusive of hormonal balance. And furthermore the hormones the body produces
itself with its own organs are not toxic to themselves or the body. This is the premise of the natural approach to
female hormonal imbalances.
The questions remain: